![]() ![]() Sort of like “going back” to 192K versus uncompressed audio.Ĭould someone comment on the comparison of specifically space and depth reproduction and discernment while using streaming audio vs. What I’m afraid of is that this new sense of space and depth will not be conveyed by the streaming system. I’ve never done streaming, but I am interested in trying it out. I didn’t mean to hijack the thread but the revealing of previously unheard differences is interesting to me. This alone has been a Holy Grail of mine for about 40 years, I am overjoyed that I’ve finally reached a satisfying level of perception in this important parameter. “Increased“ the space and depth, so to speak. The speaker cable and interconnect made the depth and space perception more palpable. The room treatments made a huge improvement in overall articulation and bass quality. It is relatively small actually but as we know small improvements can make a huge difference in satisfaction. Those three things have made an incredible improvement in my sonic experience. Also a change in speaker cable, and interconnect between preamp and amplifier. I’m pretty sure this was revealed by the recent addition of room treatments. Maybe also in high frequency content like cymbals etc. I hear the difference as improvements in depth and space perception mainly. I didn’t save CD files as 320kbps because … why bother? Also, my car system wouldn’t play files >192. Until some recent upgrades, I could not hear the difference. I do now hear a difference between 192kbps MP3 files and uncompressed content. A digital music collection always expands to fill an empty space!Ĭlick to expand. My "junk" drawer is filled with lesser capacity hard and thumb drives. One thing that I've learned over the years is that there's really no such thing as having too much storage memory. such that any comparison of the same track is valid.) In any case almost all of my DSD listening is for the multichannel tracks. are the ripped 320MP3 and DSD64 files of identical original - ie. 2: Slow-extremely robust (default), also known as synchronousFULL. But in practice, you are more likely to suffer a catastrophic disk failure or some other unrecoverable hardware fault. If I concentrate really hard while listening, I think I might be just barely able to possibly convince myself that it's better quality than MP3, although it's nearly impossible for me to be sure that I'm comparing apples and apples (ie. There is a very small (though non-zero) chance that a power failure at just the wrong time could corrupt the database. I also have an extensive SACD collection which I have ripped to individual DSD64 files which are also on that server. Thus the vast majority of my music collection is listened to as 320MP3 off a home network server. If you're an Amazon Prime subscriber, then you'll get unlimited photo storage plus. If you need more than 5GB and want to store more than just photos (i.e., files, videos, etc.) then you can pay a yearly fee to get more storage. All you need is an Amazon Account and you'll get 5GB of photo storage. Click to expand.I consider myself lucky in that I don't hear a difference between a 320MP3 file and the CD from which it was ripped. Amazon Photos is free for all Amazon customers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |